Does Smooth Away Really Work?
February 10, 2009 by Anna
Filed under Hair & Makeup
If you've read my Hair Removal Techniques post, you'll learn that with beauty comes pain. But not with the Smooth Away! Ok, I'll admit... when I first saw the commercial for Smooth Away on TV, I was a bit skeptical. Then I was walking around at one of those expos where you can actually try the product and I was STILL skeptical. They did a demonstration on a small area of my arm. At first I thought it was cool -- until I looked at the side of my arm and it looked like my hair was still there. So I immediately thought, "This doesn't work, it's just another gimmick". Then I recently went to Walgreens and I stumbled upon Smooth Away once again. For only $9.99, I thought, fine! I'll try it again. It says that it exfoliates your skin, so if it doesn't remove the hair, at least my skin will be silky smooth, right? Well I took it home and tried it on one arm and the results were night and day! The arm that I used Smooth Away on was smooth like a baby's butt and there were no signs of any hair, while the other arm was still rough, dry and hairy. So then I went crazy and used it all over my body and now I frickin love this product! Not only do the mini crystals file down the hair, it exfoliates away any dead or dry skin, leaving you feeling super smooth and soft. I'm curious to see how long it takes for the hair to grow back. So far, it's been a week and nothing. Of course results vary, but this is a super easy and painless way to remove your hair and exfoliate your skin. You have to have to have to try this product. I love it!!!
Note: when you go to purchase this product, do not order from their website or commercial! It's a complete rip off when they say they'll give you 2 sets for $14.99+shipping and handling. A lot of bad reviews came up for this product simply because people ended up paying like $50, which is way too much. You can purchase Smooth Away for much less on eBay (do not pay more than $10 for 10 pads) or at your local Walgreens/CVS store. Happy filing your hairs aways!
2009 Grammys: Where’s Chris Brown and Rihanna?
February 8, 2009 by Anna
Filed under Entertainment

There were two superstars obviously missing in action at the 2009 Grammy Awards. Chris Brown and Rihanna were a no show. What could be more important than the Grammys to a musician? Apparently, the LAW! According to E! Online:
About the time Brown was scheduled to be singing "Forever" onstage at Los Angeles' Staples Center, he was instead detained by police, being questioned for allegedly roughing up Rihanna. No charges have been filed.
Read the full article at E! Online
Kate Beckinsale: Best Dressed at the 2009 Grammy Awards
February 8, 2009 by Anna
Filed under Entertainment

Anna: "Kate Beckinsale wearing Reem Acra. This dress is gorgeous and she looks so classy and timeless."
Taylor: "I love her and I love her in this dress! Gorgeous!"
Cyndi Lauper: Worst Dressed at the 2009 Grammy Awards
February 8, 2009 by Anna
Filed under Entertainment

Ali: "If you clap too hard, the souffle on top of her head will collapse."
Lana: "Ok like seriously....why?"
Anna: "Even she doesn't know why..."

